Skip to main content
Shelter operations resource

AI review boundaries for shelters

Give staff and volunteers a shared, plain-English policy for using AI as a drafting aid without handing it placement judgment.

The useful line is operational: AI prepares review aids. Named people remain responsible for accuracy, approvals, publishing, and every decision affecting placement.

Apply for a pilot
01

AI may help draft

  • Structure intake notes into reviewable fields.
  • Summarize foster updates while preserving the source.
  • Prepare a public profile draft for staff review.
  • Organize applicant documents and flag missing context.
  • Prepare follow-up reminders and review queues.
02

AI must never decide

  • Whether an applicant is approved or rejected.
  • Whether an animal is placed with a household.
  • Whether medical or behavior claims are true.
  • Whether a public profile may publish.
  • Whether an unknown field can be treated as known.
03

Humans review

  • Accuracy against the original source material.
  • Sensitive or private information before anything is shared.
  • Tone, public-safe wording, and missing context.
  • Every approval, hold reason, and placement decision.
Named reviewer
Escalation owner
04

Explain it to the team

  • Say what the AI drafted and show the source it used.
  • Treat unknown as a valid state, not a blank to fill.
  • Record who reviewed a public or consequential change.
  • Stop using the draft when the source is weak or the stakes are unclear.

If this worksheet surfaces a specific handoff problem, WhiskerMatch can start with that one workflow while the rest of your tools stay in place.

Apply for a pilot →